As 2025 nears its end, executive teams face a pivotal question: should artificial intelligence reside within the ERP, be delivered through enterprise platforms like Azure, GCP, or AWS, or be deployed via a hybrid approach? The debate isn’t about technical feasibility—connectors and APIs have rendered both options valid. The real considerations now involve governance, adoption, cost, and trust. This post will explore the benefits of AI vs ERP platforms.

ERP vendor AI excels in depth, binding itself to the system of record and understanding transactional mechanics—orders, invoices, payroll, suppliers. That closeness delivers precision and traceability. The cost, however, is limited visibility. Without purposeful integration, ERP AI cannot fully harness context from CRM systems, PLM platforms, customer emails, Teams transcripts, or SharePoint content. It also depends heavily on the ERP vendor’s innovation roadmap, which may slow pace of capability expansion.

Platform AI, conversely, emphasizes breadth. Tools like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and AWS Bedrock can cover the structured data of the ERP and the unstructured data across enterprise communications and collaboration tools. This breadth enhances context and collaborative workflows. Its drawback lies in weaker schema familiarity. Without rigorous grounding in ERP structures, outputs may be generic or, worse, misleading. Reconciling conflicting outputs between enterprise AI and ERP AI demands strong governance frameworks.

AI in Data Management

Download this guide to discover how artificial intelligence is reshaping the way organizations handle data.

AI vs ERP: Current Trends

To inform such choices, executives can look to current trends. For example:

$33.9B invested in generative AI; 78% of firms using AI in at least one business function (Stanford AI Index 2025).
→ Implication: AI adoption is mainstream. The risk is not whether to use AI in ERP or platforms, but how fast you can operationalize it. Waiting for ERP vendor roadmaps may slow your competitive pace.
Forecast: 103–306 foundation models by 2028 will exceed regulatory compute thresholds (Kumar & Manning, 2025).
→ Implication: The model ecosystem is fragmenting. Platform AI (Azure, GCP, AWS) is designed to orchestrate across many models, making it more future-proof. ERP AI, typically tied to one vendor’s preferred model, risks lock-in.
Architectural shift toward “agentic systems” blending autonomy, explainability, and composability (WEF, 2025).
→ Implication: The enterprise is moving beyond point copilots to distributed, composable AI agents. These thrive in platform environments with cross-system context. ERP AI can serve as the “trusted ground truth” node, but is unlikely to lead in orchestration.
Gartner forecasts: >40% of agentic AI projects will be scrapped by 2027; by 2028, 15% of day-to-day decisions will be autonomous, and 33% of enterprise software will embed agentic AI.
→ Implication: Platform AI offers breadth but comes with high failure risk and governance cost. ERP AI, by contrast, advances more conservatively but with higher reliability inside core processes. The choice is between velocity with risk (platform) and stability with limits (ERP).
The rise of agentic AI introduces governance, trust, and integration challenges that must be solved before scaling. (Capgemini, 2025).
→ Implication: Running both ERP AI and Platform AI in tandem multiplies complexity. CEOs must decide whether their organization has the governance maturity to handle hybrid, or whether to anchor trust in a single approach.

“Platform AI has made faster visible progress in breadth and innovation. ERP AI, by contrast, has made quieter progress in precision and compliance. One is a sprint, the other a marathon — and enterprises need both.”

Marney Edwards

The Takeaway: AI vs ERP

These figures underscore that AI is now a strategic board-level concern. The issue is not which system is superior, but rather which set of limitations a company can tolerate.

Can you accept precision with narrow scope, or breadth with rough edges?

Running both systems in tandem introduces complexity (and expense):

How should conflicting outputs be resolved?
Who decides which is “truth”?
How do you maintain “trust” in the Data?
How is security synchronized between ERP roles and enterprise access controls?
How do you manage event-based ERP costs alongside token-based platform billing?

Prepare Now for 2026

The remainder of 2025 will not be about predicting a future path, it’s about framing the questions that must guide your AI strategy now. The time to set governance, usage models, and accountability is here.

To get started on a comprehensive AI strategy for the new year, turn to Ultra Consultants. Our AI Readiness Services help you build a future-proof foundation for AI. Ultra helps you avoid missteps, accelerate time-to-value, and ensure your AI investments drive lasting impact. Request your AI Readiness Assessment call today.

Ready to start your digital transformation journey?

Click the button below to request your free discovery call.

Get Started

About the Author

Marney Edwards

Marney Edwards is a senior consultant at Ultra Consultants and an AWS machine learning engineer with 15+ years helping manufacturers and logistics organizations adopt technology that works. He is known for cutting through hype and focusing on day-to-day impacts: faster onboarding, simpler SOP access, and clearer workflows. Colleagues value his people first style—fast pilots, clear ROI, and adoption that lasts—plus his ability to translate between leaders, SMEs, and engineers so teams see progress quickly.