Manufacturing and distribution organizations well know that an ERP selection project is a complex endeavor with long-term strategic implications – an effort fraught with risk and requiring significant organizational resources. As project teams approach evaluation and selection, they often run into the concepts of Best of Breed vs.Best in Class ERP.
These concepts have been around a long time and still serve to confuse.
I’ll be devoting a few blog posts to provide clarity around the two approaches.
Defining Best of Breed ERP – A Single Hammer
A best of breed solution is much like a single tool – say a hammer — developed to solve a specific problem – driving a nail.
Industry analysts define a best of breed system as the best system developed to address a specific niche or functional area. The application performs specialized functions better than an integrated system, such as standalone quality management or inventory tracking as an example. Best of breed systems are developed and sold by separate vendors.
A “Best of Breed” solution is oftentimes the best choice if a company’s business requirements are so specific that a single ERP can’t address their unique set of business conditions.
Defining Best in Class – The Entire Tool Box
Think of a “Best in Class” solution as an entire set of specialty tools available within a fully-stocked tool chest.
Best in Class ERP combines core functions of a manufacturing enterprise into a single, integrated enterprise-wide software suite. There is tight integration between functions, linking manufacturing, finance, supply chain management, quality, inventory, maintenance and other functions in a single universe.
ERP vendors from tier one, two or three develop and market integrated ERP offering the features and functions that best meet the needs of a specific industry.
The Pros and Cons of Best of Breed vs. Best in Class ERP
When evaluating these two different approaches, should a company implement multiple best-of-breed packages or pursue a single integrated ERP solution?
Let’s start with the pros and cons of each approach:
Best of Breed – The Pros and Cons
The up-side of single, standalone best of breed applications is that a focused set of features and functions handle specific functionality. Each department is independent in terms of their IT strategy, maintenance and upgrade schedule. Additional benefits include:
- Flexibile approach to managing system upgrades
- Wide choice of specialized systems and vendors
- Modular application maintenance
- Note: Some Best of Breed providers utilize a Service Oriented Architecture which enables easier modular integration
The down-side of a Best of Breed approach are the issues associated with multiple systems, databases and vendors. Maintaining multiple systems provides little cross connectivity, which creates maintenance and integration challenges. It’s complex and resource-draining for many companies. Additional negatives include:
- Networking complexity
- Training that is disjointed across departments
- Multiple vendors required to de-bug, or solve problems
- Potential for data integrity issues because of multiple interface touch-points
- Access to consolidated data may require additional applications like a Data Warehouse for reporting
- Duplicate entry of data
- Strain on IT resources for support
- Upgrades can get out of sync and cause disruption
- Different user interfaces leading to risk of user non-acceptance
- Disjointed business processes
- High total cost of ownership due to multiple vendor support costs.
- More expensive IT skills needed for integration tools
Fully Integrated Best in Class – The Pros and Cons
By far the biggest benefit of a single, integrated Best in Class ERP suite is full data integration across functions. As manufacturing becomes more challenging and complex, best in class systems tightly link data and processes together cross-functionally. The primary pros include:
- Single system implementation
- Single database of records
- Single supplier support for ease of management
- Standardized technology across the enterprise
- Single User-Interface experience for user acceptance, ease of training
- More control of total cost
- Single data point across multiple processes
- Improved end-to-end process support
The downside of a Best in Class approach is that very often, a single suite can’t adequately address specific core functions. We’ve seen limited functionality in some areas, including product lifecycle management and other engineering-related functions. Additional cons include
- Customization is more difficult
- Upgrades are more complex
- Vendor viability is a risk
- Potentially less options when adding features and functions
- Tied to one vendor for support and maintenance
Evaluating Best of Breed vs. Best in Class ERP?
Get educated. White paper provides a proven plan for ERP.
Best of Breed vs. Best in Class ERP – Further Insight
- As outlined in this first blog post of my series, these two very different approaches to enterprise technology deserve careful consideration.
- Watch for my next blog post in the series which suggests key questions to ask when evaluating your options.
- For further insight, download a timely white paper entitled “Planning for ERP” to gain additional perspectives.